2009 Citroen C1 vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 959 kg more than 2009 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1. 1992 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C1 has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C1 | 1992 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | C1 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 5992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 333 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3650 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 157 km/hour | 254 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 6.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 89 L |
