2009 Citroen C1 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 998 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C1 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C1 has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 2003 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | C1 | eK |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2350 mm |