2009 Citroen C1 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 165 kg more than 2009 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1. 2003 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C1 has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | C1 | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 157 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 50 L |