2009 Citroen C1 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (242 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 715 kg more than 2009 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C1 | C70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Top Speed | 157 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14 seconds | 7.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 68 L |