2009 Citroen C1 vs. 2004 Lexus SC
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lexus SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lexus SC would be higher. At 4,277 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lexus SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lexus SC (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lexus SC should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lexus SC weights approximately 877 kg more than 2009 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lexus SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lexus SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lexus SC (441 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm). This means 2004 Lexus SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 2004 Lexus SC | |
Make | Citroen | Lexus |
Model | C1 | SC |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 4277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1742 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 75 L |