2009 Citroen C1 vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C1 weights approximately 56 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C1 | MPV |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1472 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 75 L |