2009 Citroen C1 vs. 2008 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 555 kg more than 2009 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Matrix (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 2008 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | C1 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 50 L |