2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Talbot T 26 (198 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 615 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C2 | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Citroen | Talbot |
| Model | C2 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
