2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C2 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C2 (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C2 | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | C2 | Colt |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2360 mm |