2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1968 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C2 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C2 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C2 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C2 | 1968 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | C2 | Fronte |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 66 L |