2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1975 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C2 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C2 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1975 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C2 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 1300. (94 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 1300. 2009 Citroen C2 has automatic transmission and 1975 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1975 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Citroen C2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: