2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda 616 (79 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C2 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C2 | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 616 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2480 mm |