2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1151 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2.
Because 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C2 | 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Citroen | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | C2 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 202 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 2206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 107 L |
