2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1983 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C2 (126 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Dodge Charger weights approximately 25 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Dodge Charger (161 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (143 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1983 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C2 | 1983 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | C2 | Charger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2460 mm |