2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1984 Lancia Beta
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Lancia Beta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lancia Beta (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Lancia Beta weights approximately 110 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Lancia Beta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lancia Beta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lancia Beta (165 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1984 Lancia Beta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C2 | 1984 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Citroen | Lancia |
Model | C2 | Beta |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 59 L |