2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Suzuki Baleno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Suzuki Baleno (119 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Suzuki Baleno weights approximately 90 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Suzuki Baleno (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1996 Suzuki Baleno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C2 | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | C2 | Baleno |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2490 mm |