2009 Citroen C2 vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 2,521 cc, 2001 Volvo SCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 396 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (147 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C2 | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C2 | SCC |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 70 L |
