2009 Citroen C2 vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Megane (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Megane weights approximately 355 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Megane (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2. 2002 Renault Megane has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C2 has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Renault Megane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C2 | 2002 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Citroen | Renault |
| Model | C2 | Megane |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |
