2009 Citroen C2 vs. 2003 Lexus LS
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lexus LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lexus LS would be higher. At 4,293 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lexus LS (282 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lexus LS weights approximately 840 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Lexus LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lexus LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lexus LS (418 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2003 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2. 2003 Lexus LS has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C2 has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Lexus LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C2 | 2003 Lexus LS | |
| Make | Citroen | Lexus |
| Model | C2 | LS |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 418 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.2 seconds | 6.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2930 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 84 L |
