2009 Citroen C2 vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C2 | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | C2 | KB |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 3494 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 93.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 76 L |