2009 Citroen C2 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 474 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 923 kg more than 2009 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 629 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C2 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
| Model | C2 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 548 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 747 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1913 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |
