2009 Citroen C3 vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Volvo PV (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Volvo PV should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Volvo PV weights approximately 367 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Volvo PV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Volvo PV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C3 | 1941 Volvo PV | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C3 | PV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 3668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1123 kg | 1490 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |
