2009 Citroen C3 vs. 1953 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Humber Pullman (116 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 982 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C3. (116 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C3 | 1953 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Citroen | Humber |
Model | C3 | Pullman |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 4138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 286 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1158 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |