2009 Citroen C3 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volvo 220 (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C3 weights approximately 108 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C3 (161 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C3 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C3 | 220 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1123 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |