2009 Citroen C3 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C3 (75 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 80 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 115 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C3 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C3 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2540 mm |