2009 Citroen C3 vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (75 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C3 | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | C3 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
