2009 Citroen C3 vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3.

Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C3. (94 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen C3 1986 Mazda RX-7
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C3 RX-7
Year Released 2009 1986
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1124 cc 2354 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 59 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 94 Nm 246 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 3000 RPM
Top Speed 153 km/hour 230 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2430 mm