2009 Citroen C3 vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 172 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C3. (133 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C3 | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C3 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1126 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |