2009 Citroen C3 vs. 2003 Mazda 2

To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (79 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C3 weights approximately 161 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen C3 2003 Mazda 2
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C3 2
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1360 cc 1388 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 72 HP 79 HP
Torque 118 Nm 128 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 73.7 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 76.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1211 kg 1050 kg
Vehicle Length 3940 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1570 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 50 L