2009 Citroen C3 vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (294 HP) has 222 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 499 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C3. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C3. 2004 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen C3 2004 Jaguar XJ
Make Citroen Jaguar
Model C3 XJ
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1360 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 72 HP 294 HP
Torque 118 Nm 411 Nm
Engine Bore Size 73.7 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1211 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 3940 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1570 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 3040 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.2 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 85 L