2009 Citroen C3 vs. 2005 Maybach 57
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Maybach 57. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Maybach 57 would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Maybach 57 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Maybach 57 (542 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 467 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (75 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Maybach 57 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Maybach 57 weights approximately 1205 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Maybach 57 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Maybach 57. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Maybach 57 (900 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 785 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C3. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2005 Maybach 57 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C3. 2005 Maybach 57 has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Maybach 57 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C3 | 2005 Maybach 57 | |
| Make | Citroen | Maybach |
| Model | C3 | 57 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 5513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 900 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.4 seconds | 5.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 2210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2220 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 15.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 110 L |
