2009 Citroen C3 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo (119 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 170 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C3 | 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
Make | Citroen | Chevrolet |
Model | C3 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1211 kg | 1381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |