2009 Citroen C4 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 2009 Citroen C4 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C4. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C4 weights approximately 297 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.

Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C4. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C4.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen C4 1973 Mazda RX-2
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C4 RX-2
Year Released 2009 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1358 cc 2292 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 87 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 133 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1257 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2480 mm