2009 Citroen C5 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Citroen C5 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C5 (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C5 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C5 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | C5 | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1624 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2160 mm |