2009 Citroen C5 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2009 Citroen C5 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C5 (131 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C5 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C5 (314 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C5 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C5 | Midge |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |