2009 Citroen C5 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2009 Citroen C5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C5. (106 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C5 weights approximately 427 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C5 (250 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C5 | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | C5 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1527 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |
