2009 Citroen C6 vs. 1968 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2009 Citroen C6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C6 (209 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C6 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1968 Skoda 1202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C6 (290 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C6 | 1968 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Citroen | Skoda |
Model | C6 | 1202 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 12.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |