2009 Citroen C6 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2009 Citroen C6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C6. (201 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C6 weights approximately 185 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C6 (440 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C6 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | C6 | Dakota |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2720 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.3:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 83 L |