2009 Citroen C8 vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2009 Citroen C8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C8 (106 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C8 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C8 weights approximately 373 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C8 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (139 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C8 | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C8 | 240 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 23.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1743 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 58 L |