2009 Citroen C8 vs. 2004 Mazda 6

To start off, 2009 Citroen C8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (138 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C8. (106 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C8 weights approximately 203 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C8. (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C8.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen C8 2004 Mazda 6
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C8 6
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Minivan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 106 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 270 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.0:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Top Speed 174 km/hour 200 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 14.6 seconds 10.7 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1743 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.4 L/100km 6.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 64 L