2009 Citroen Xsara vs. 1968 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen Xsara (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 725 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen Xsara | 1968 Renault 4 | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Xsara | 4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 38 L |