2009 Citroen Xsara vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen Xsara (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 414 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen Xsara (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen Xsara | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | Xsara | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1184 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2160 mm |
