2009 Citroen Xsara vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2009 Citroen Xsara. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen Xsara.

Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen Xsara. (161 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen Xsara 1986 Mazda RX-7
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara RX-7
Year Released 2009 1986
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1749 cc 2354 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 114 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 161 Nm 246 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Top Speed 190 km/hour 230 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2430 mm