2009 Citroen Xsara vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen Xsara (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 510 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen Xsara (205 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen Xsara 1986 Nissan Pulsar
Make Citroen Nissan
Model Xsara Pulsar
Year Released 2009 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1270 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 205 Nm 96 Nm
Torque RPM 1900 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1375 kg 865 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2420 mm