2009 Citroen Xsara vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 1,749 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 60 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen Xsara | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | Xsara | AA-X |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1749 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2530 mm |
