2009 Citroen Xsara vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (176 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2009 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen Xsara | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | Xsara | TL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2840 mm |