2009 Citroen Xsara vs. 1996 Mazda 121

To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen Xsara (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 229 kg more than 1996 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen Xsara (191 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen Xsara 1996 Mazda 121
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara 121
Year Released 2009 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1753 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 134 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 191 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1293 kg 1064 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 3830 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2460 mm