2009 Citroen Xsara vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2009 Citroen Xsara. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen Xsara.

Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen Xsara. (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Citroen Xsara 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara BT-50
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type Hatchback Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1359 cc 2953 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 154 HP
Torque 120 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 180 RPM
Engine Bore Size 75 mm 96.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 77 mm 102 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3010 mm