2009 Dacia Logan vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Dacia Logan is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2009 Dacia Logan. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2009 Dacia Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dacia Logan weights approximately 125 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dacia Logan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dacia Logan (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Dacia Logan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dacia Logan | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Dacia | Mazda |
Model | Logan | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1459 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 57 L |