2009 Dacia Logan vs. 2008 Nissan Terrano
To start off, 2009 Dacia Logan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Terrano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Terrano would be higher. At 2,664 cc, 2008 Nissan Terrano is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Terrano weights approximately 755 kg more than 2009 Dacia Logan.
Because 2008 Nissan Terrano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dacia Logan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Terrano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Terrano (279 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dacia Logan. (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Terrano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dacia Logan.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dacia Logan | 2008 Nissan Terrano | |
Make | Dacia | Nissan |
Model | Logan | Terrano |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1459 cc | 2664 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15 seconds | 15.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 72 L |